Competitor Comparison

The EvidentID Alternative: COI Tracking Built In, Not Bolted On

If you're evaluating EvidentID or looking for an EvidentID alternative, here's the difference that matters most for COI compliance.

 

EvidentID is a broad third-party risk platform that covers background checks, credential verification, motor vehicle records, and business verification alongside COI tracking.

 

PINS is built specifically for COI and endorsement compliance. If COI tracking is your primary need, the difference shows up in what each platform includes by default and what it charges you extra for.

 

Quick comparison

PINS vs EvidentID at a glance

EvidentID is a broad third-party risk platform. PINS is built specifically for COI and endorsement compliance. The difference shows up in what each platform includes by default.

  • Purpose-built for COI and endorsement compliance
  • Full workflow included: collection, AI-assisted review, renewals, approvals
  • Your team controls every compliance decision
  • Native Procore and Vista integrations
  • US-based product experts handle implementation and support

Best for teams that want COI compliance software built around their workflow.

EvidentID

  • Broad third-party risk platform covering COI alongside background checks, credential verification, and more
  • Core COI features require plan upgrades or add-ons
  • Lacking native integrations
  • Implementation is guided self-service on base plan

Better fit for enterprise teams managing multiple types of third-party risk in one platform.

Third-party proof

What Evident users say

Public reviews point to a recurring issue: when teams need help, support can become part of the problem instead of part of the solution.

Customer service is probably the worst I’ve ever worked with in terms of a B2B company.

There is absolutely no customer service. No one will call you ever and there's nothing but a virtual assistant.

Why teams switch:

Teams do not just switch for features. They switch because they want faster implementation, better workflow fit, and support they can rely on when something goes wrong.

Deep comparison

PINS vs EvidentID: a closer look

A side-by-side look at the product and workflow differences that matter most for COI compliance programs.

PINS
EvidentID
Endorsement validation
PINS

Endorsement language verified against your contract requirements. Included at every tier.

EvidentID

Endorsement validation requires an upgraded plan.

Requirements setup
PINS

Requirements set by vendor, contract, or project type. Expert-led setup included in onboarding.

EvidentID

Requirements at vendor level only on base plan. Setting contract specific requirements requires an add-on fee.

Renewal sequences
PINS

Configurable renewal timing, email language, and follow-up sequences included at every tier.

EvidentID

Fully configurable email cadences require an upgraded plan, not available in all subscriptions.

User permissions
PINS

Role-based tiered permissions included at every tier. Unlimited users.

EvidentID

Equal access permissions only on Essential. Role-based tiered permissions require upgraded plans.

AI approach
PINS

AI reviews submissions and returns findings with evidence. Your team controls which actions the AI takes on your behalf.

EvidentID

AI-based first pass document processing included. AI autonomy level is set by the platform, not your team.

Integrations
PINS

Native integrations and Open API available for any tier.

EvidentID

Lacking native integrations. API access only available at the highest subscription tier.

Implementation and support
PINS

White-glove implementation included. US-based product experts handle onboarding and stay with your account after go-live.

EvidentID

Guided self-service onboarding unless you pay for an upgraded plan. 

Primary use case
PINS

Purpose-built for COI and endorsement compliance.

EvidentID

COI Tracking is a secondary use case with all core functionality requiring an additional fee in order to access.

The core pieces of a COI compliance workflow; endorsement validation, configurable renewals, role-based permissions, and expert onboarding; should not be add-on line items. They should be the product. With EvidentID, each one is either an upgrade or an add-on. If COI compliance is your primary need, buy software built for it. Not a broader platform where you pay separately for the pieces that matter most.

Need help deciding?

PINS vs EvidentID FAQ

Answers to the questions agencies ask when comparing products.

What is the best alternative to EvidentID?

PINS is built for teams whose primary need is COI and endorsement compliance, not broader third-party risk management. Where EvidentID treats COI tracking as one module inside a larger identity and background-check platform, requiring plan upgrades for endorsement validation, role-based permissions, and configurable renewals, PINS includes all of that at every tier because COI compliance is the whole product, not an add-on. If you're evaluating EvidentID alternatives specifically because COI tracking is your core requirement, PINS is built around that directly.

What is the biggest difference between PINS and EvidentID?

PINS is built specifically for COI and endorsement compliance. The full workflow spanning endorsement validation, configurable renewals, role-based permissions, and white-glove implementation, is included. EvidentID is a broad third-party risk platform where COI tracking is one module among many. With EvidentID, the core pieces of a COI compliance workflow require a plan upgrade or an add-on to access. If COI compliance is your primary need, the difference is whether you are buying software built for it or paying separately to piece together the workflow you need.

Does EvidentID include endorsement validation?

Not on the base plan. EvidentID's Essential plan covers standard ACORD 25 certificate information. Verifying the actual endorsement language requires an upgraded plan at a higher cost. If endorsement review is part of your compliance workflow, plan on paying for the upgrade before you start.

Why do teams switch from EvidentID to PINS?

Most teams come to PINS after realizing the features they actually need for day-to-day COI compliance are not in the plan they bought. Endorsement validation, configurable renewal sequences, and role-based permissions all require upgrades or add-ons on EvidentID. Teams that need a COI compliance workflow, not a broader third-party risk platform, find that PINS includes what they need without requiring them to build it piece by piece.

Who is EvidentID a better fit for?

EvidentID makes more sense for enterprise teams that need a single platform to manage multiple types of third-party risk: background checks, motor vehicle records, business verification, and credential checks alongside COI tracking. If that breadth is what your program needs, the platform has value. If your primary need is COI compliance, you are buying a platform built for something broader and paying separately to get the COI workflow pieces you need.

Stop Reviewing.

Start Approving.

Schedule Demo
Insured Profile Page showing insurance policies in compliant status-1